Page 1 of 2

Ankerdine by the Pros

Posted: 12 Sep 2007 15:05
by Missiles
OK, so let's have a little quiz to see who can guess most accurately the time it took the breakaway group of the Tour of Britain to climb Ankerdine today:

- John and I timed them exactly the same as for our Little Mountain.
- Dan Soltys (Wrekinsport CC), who holds the record for the combined climbs in our event, rode up Ankderdine in 3.24 this year.
- Stuart Dangerfield did it in 3.22 in 2004.
- Everyone reported that they seemed to be taking it easy up there today.

So, what is your guess for the time they did today? Who's going to go first?

Posted: 12 Sep 2007 15:09
by Between Peaks
2:55

Posted: 12 Sep 2007 15:09
by Philip Whiteman
I am going to hazard a guess at around 3.30ish

Posted: 12 Sep 2007 15:15
by Neil Compton
ok, as you said they seemed to be taking it easy and i really couldn't tell as i was taking photos i'll have a guess at 3.10. My thinking is that riding up that hill solo is harder than a bunch. Also they are professional cyclists who ride for a living and they had a big crowd cheering them on. They should really have gone up quicker than 3.22 but i wouldn't be suprised if you say they were slower.

Posted: 12 Sep 2007 15:27
by Missiles
I'm not having 'ishes' Phil! What's your guess?!

Posted: 12 Sep 2007 15:29
by Missiles
ps. I'll think up a prize for the winner eventually............ maybe a free entry to the 2008 LMTT???!!

Posted: 12 Sep 2007 15:45
by Philip Whiteman
Missiles wrote:I'm not having 'ishes' Phil! What's your guess?!
3.35

Posted: 12 Sep 2007 15:47
by Ringo
3 minutes flat. ish :lol:

Posted: 12 Sep 2007 15:53
by Missiles
No, it wasn't flat, Adrian, it was a great big hill! :wink:

Posted: 12 Sep 2007 15:59
by Ringo
actually i'd like to change my guess. the break away group looked like they were going up at quite a pace so i'll now say 2.30. ish :lol:

Posted: 12 Sep 2007 16:03
by Stats
I reckon about 3.10 for the lead group

Posted: 12 Sep 2007 16:12
by CakeStop
2:48

I reserve the right to decline any prize involving 39 miles of pain in the highly unlikely event that I'm closest.

Posted: 12 Sep 2007 16:50
by Ed Moss
2.57...few pics from Wolverhampton :wink:
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

Posted: 12 Sep 2007 17:03
by Philip Whiteman
John Hitchcock would like to offer 4-06

Posted: 12 Sep 2007 17:42
by Garfield el Pirata
Nice shots Ed.Were they twins :D 2.59

Posted: 12 Sep 2007 18:18
by dicvic
3.13

Posted: 12 Sep 2007 18:34
by George
I thought the bunch came up fairly steady (they certainly seemed to have time to call and wave to me), but the break were doing a fair lick. Hammond definitely looked as though he was hurting. And I'd guess that not only are these guys a notch or two above the likes of Soltys, but he was riding a TT, where he's presumably pacing himself a bit in the interests of a good overall time. Today, I'd think the pros in the break kicked on the hill to try and shake one or two off. So I'm guessing that they went up in less than 3 minutes. If a precise time is needed, I'd say 2.57.

Posted: 12 Sep 2007 19:19
by Ed Moss
Garfield el Pirata wrote:Nice shots Ed.Were they twins :D 2.59
Edney keep your mind on Saturday

Posted: 14 Sep 2007 19:16
by Ed Moss
So what time did they do or are we still trying to get a signal on Ankerdine :wink:

Posted: 15 Sep 2007 08:47
by George
Yes, I've just come in search of the answer to the very same question ... which, incidentally, has also been posed as far afield as Australia.

So, spill the beans, Ruth: how swift was Swift?

Posted: 18 Sep 2007 12:56
by Missiles
Right, well let's just check on everyone's bids and make sure nobody wants to change their mind...........

(Oh, and I should add that I've spotted that Dangerfield climbed Ankerdine in 3.12 in 2000, so I think that's the fastest it's been done as part of the LMTT.)

2.30 Adrian
2.48 Steve
2.55 Neil H
2.57 Ed
2.59 Colin
3.10 Neil C
3.13 Richard
3.35 Phil
4.06 John H

Brian, you can't guess the same time as Neil (3.10) and he got there first so what are you going to go for?

And George, you can't guess the same as Ed (2.57). What's your new bid?

Anyone else want to guess? Anyone want to change their mind?

Posted: 18 Sep 2007 13:09
by George
Missiles wrote: And George, you can't guess the same as Ed (2.57). What's your new bid?
Ah, I hadn't noticed that clash ... I thought I was choosing a unique time. Now, if I go for any other time in the just-under-3-minutes range, I can only win if I'm absolutely spot on. But if I go up or down a few seconds, I could be closest without being exactly right. So I'm going to say 3.04. (And, Brian, you just keep out of my 'bracket', alright?)

By the way, what's the prize?

Posted: 18 Sep 2007 14:18
by chalkie
i'll have 3.03 thanks. :lol:

Posted: 18 Sep 2007 15:28
by Missiles
OK, here's an update:

2.30 Adrian
2.48 Steve
2.55 Neil H
2.57 Ed
2.59 Colin
3.03 Charles
3.04 George
3.10 Neil C
3.13 Richard
3.35 Phil
4.06 John H

Any more for any more? I'll donate a free entry to next year's LMTT to the winner. :D

Posted: 18 Sep 2007 16:20
by Between Peaks
Missiles wrote:
Any more for any more? I'll donate a free entry to next year's LMTT to the winner. :D
in which case, can I change my guess to 20 minutes?

Posted: 18 Sep 2007 20:45
by Albert Cox
2.58 If i may, Ruth

Posted: 18 Sep 2007 21:05
by Missiles
Of course you may, Albert. (Don't tell me, the offer of a free entry for the Little Mountain TT tempted you? :wink: )

2.30 Adrian
2.48 Steve
2.55 Neil H
2.57 Ed
2.58 Albert
2.59 Colin
3.03 Charles
3.04 George
3.10 Neil C
3.13 Richard
3.35 Phil
4.06 John H

Any more for any more? Where Hercules? Obviously not in the library!

Posted: 18 Sep 2007 21:06
by Missiles
Between Peaks wrote:
Missiles wrote:
Any more for any more? I'll donate a free entry to next year's LMTT to the winner. :D
in which case, can I change my guess to 20 minutes?
No. :D

Posted: 18 Sep 2007 21:22
by Rod Goodfellow
3m12

Posted: 18 Sep 2007 21:25
by Albert Cox
Too right, Ruth!

I now 'fancy my chance' after watching Steve's excellent 'on- bike video' footage of a climb up..... 'That Swine, Ankerdine'

Posted: 18 Sep 2007 21:31
by Missiles
Thanks Rod - you're after a free ride in the LMTT too eh?

2.30 Adrian
2.48 Steve
2.55 Neil H
2.57 Ed
2.58 Albert
2.59 Colin
3.03 Charles
3.04 George
3.10 Neil C
3.12 Rod
3.13 Richard
3.35 Phil
4.06 John H

Posted: 18 Sep 2007 22:24
by Roobay
The suspense is killing me :shock:
whats thw bloody answer
jr

Posted: 18 Sep 2007 22:37
by Missiles
You haven't guessed yet, John? C'mon, what dya reckon? :wink:

Posted: 18 Sep 2007 23:54
by Stats
my time is not there 8) rewad the rest now 3.07

Posted: 19 Sep 2007 11:55
by Roobay
2.56 :D
jr

Posted: 19 Sep 2007 23:59
by Missiles
The latest bids are:

2.30 Adrian
2.48 Steve
2.55 Neil H
2.56 John R
2.57 Ed
2.58 Albert
2.59 Colin
3.03 Charles
3.04 George
3.07 Brian
3.10 Neil C
3.12 Rod
3.13 Richard
3.35 Phil
4.06 John H

This is your final chance to change your mind or put a first bid in if you haven't done so yet...............

Posted: 20 Sep 2007 10:37
by Phil The Furious
Im gonna guess 3:00.

Posted: 20 Sep 2007 10:55
by Missiles
Thanks Phil.

2.30 Adrian
2.48 Steve
2.55 Neil H
2.56 John R
2.57 Ed
2.58 Albert
2.59 Colin
3.00 Phil F
3.03 Charles
3.04 George
3.07 Brian
3.10 Neil C
3.12 Rod
3.13 Richard
3.35 Phil W
4.06 John H

There are still a few out there who haven't bid yet...............

Posted: 20 Sep 2007 12:40
by Metal Fatigue
1:07

Posted: 20 Sep 2007 12:41
by Roobay
Metal Fatigue wrote:1:07
:lol: :roll:

Posted: 20 Sep 2007 13:23
by Ed Moss
Metal Fatigue wrote:1:07
Mixed your turps a bit strong this morning ? :lol:

Posted: 20 Sep 2007 13:41
by Missiles
Ed Moss wrote:
Metal Fatigue wrote:1:07
Mixed your turps a bit strong this morning ? :lol:
LOL!

Posted: 20 Sep 2007 13:50
by Hissing Sid
3.05

Jock

Posted: 20 Sep 2007 14:02
by Missiles
Thanks Jock.

1.07 Hercules
2.30 Adrian
2.48 Steve
2.55 Neil H
2.56 John R
2.57 Ed
2.58 Albert
2.59 Colin
3.00 Phil F
3.03 Charles
3.04 George
3.05 Jock
3.07 Brian
3.10 Neil C
3.12 Rod
3.13 Richard
3.35 Phil W
4.06 John H

Posted: 20 Sep 2007 19:59
by Metal Fatigue
I just wanted to be top of the list.

Posted: 21 Sep 2007 16:32
by Steve Halman
3.18
:!:

Posted: 21 Sep 2007 18:02
by fdj francaise des jeux
3:28 :P

Posted: 21 Sep 2007 20:56
by Andy Terry
3:07

Posted: 21 Sep 2007 23:13
by Missiles
Thanks Steve and Stuart.

Andy, Brian got to 3.07 before you. You could go for 3.06 or 3.08 though?

1.07 Hercules
2.30 Adrian
2.48 Steve S
2.55 Neil H
2.56 John R
2.57 Ed
2.58 Albert
2.59 Colin
3.00 Phil F
3.03 Charles
3.04 George
3.05 Jock
3.07 Brian
3.10 Neil C
3.12 Rod
3.13 Richard
3.18 Steve H
3.28 Stuart
3.35 Phil W
4.06 John H[/quote]

Posted: 22 Sep 2007 00:05
by Andy Terry
I'll have 2:40 instead, please.