Ceramic BBs are supposedly better than normal BBs but are three to four times more expensive.
Just a few of questions:
- what are their longevity compared to a 'normal' BB?
- I assume that they are greased within a cartridge, cannot be relubricated and likely to suffer water ingress like any other BB; if so, what is the advantage?
Ceramic Bottom Brackets
Moderators: Philip Whiteman, Andy Terry
- Philip Whiteman
- Posts: 2046
- Joined: 19 Nov 2006 16:17
- Real Name:
- Location: Drayton, Worcestershire
Re: Ceramic Bottom Brackets
As you know I have recently changed to a ceramic bottom bracket on my every day bike. So as its very early days, I cannot really comment on its longevity.Philip Whiteman wrote:Ceramic BBs are supposedly better than normal BBs but are three to four times more expensive.
Just a few of questions:
- what are their longevity compared to a 'normal' BB?
- I assume that they are greased within a cartridge, cannot be relubricated and likely to suffer water ingress like any other BB; if so, what is the advantage?
But I can pass comment on the stainless steel versions, as all my bikes have them fitted now, and I would recommend the fitment of them for a couple of reasons:
1) First and for most, they will out last a std bottom bracket by a country mile.
2) They have considerably less drag than a std bottom bracket. In fact the differance is quite amazing at how smoothly they rotate. That said, if you could tell the differance when pedalling is another matter? But I know from experiance when a stainless steel one is fitted and before the chain is fitted, spin the cranks and see how smooth and the duration that the cranks spin? Repeat that with a std bottom bracket and you'll see the differance!
Fitting a ceramic bottom bracket, will see that result go up to another level.
Like all external botttom brackets the bearings are sealed, so no additional lubrication is possible or even necessary. But using Hope as an example, they have a much better seal than OE ones, so of course this will also help in increasing the longevity. Using Hope as an example once again, you can purchase replacement bearing, unlike OE bottom brackets.
The biggest advantage, neither stainless steel or ceramic bearing will ever suffer from pitting, unlike OE ones. This is the biggest reason for bottom brackets failing.
"You only need two tools: WD40 and duct tape. If it doesn't move and it should, use WD40. If it moves and it shouldn't, use duct tape"
I have just found these on e-bay and are certainly worth thinking about:-
Ceramic
Stainless Steel
Quite a lot cheaper than Hope, and Pro Lite stuff is very good and I would have no hesitation at all in recommending it. But its a pity that they only do them in one colour though.
Ceramic
Stainless Steel
Quite a lot cheaper than Hope, and Pro Lite stuff is very good and I would have no hesitation at all in recommending it. But its a pity that they only do them in one colour though.
"You only need two tools: WD40 and duct tape. If it doesn't move and it should, use WD40. If it moves and it shouldn't, use duct tape"
On The TT forum anything ceramic has pretty much been discussed, conclusion, performance v cost, the benefits are really not worth it.
Ceramic in principle is good, but to perform, the bearings need to put under a lot more pressure than your legs could ever produce..In your head you may go faster, but in reality stick with steel.
Ceramic in principle is good, but to perform, the bearings need to put under a lot more pressure than your legs could ever produce..In your head you may go faster, but in reality stick with steel.