Brake pad length
Moderators: Philip Whiteman, Andy Terry
Brake pad length
Pads for cantilever brakes are usually 55mm. But pads for V-brakes are usually 70mm. The fixings are usually identical.
What's the reason for using shorter blocks with cantilevers? Is there any reason why I shouldn't fit V-brake pads & shoes to the cantilevers on my touring bike? Wouldn't the increased contact area provide better braking, and wouldn't that be useful, e.g. on a laden tourer in the wet?
What's the reason for using shorter blocks with cantilevers? Is there any reason why I shouldn't fit V-brake pads & shoes to the cantilevers on my touring bike? Wouldn't the increased contact area provide better braking, and wouldn't that be useful, e.g. on a laden tourer in the wet?
- petemarshall
- Posts: 663
- Joined: 17 Jan 2014 16:40
- Real Name: Pete Marshall
- Location: Stourbridge
Re: Brake pad length
It might making braking worse? if the same force is applied across a greater area = reduced force per given area = reduced friction ??George wrote:Pads for cantilever brakes are usually 55mm. But pads for V-brakes are usually 70mm. The fixings are usually identical.
What's the reason for using shorter blocks with cantilevers? Is there any reason why I shouldn't fit V-brake pads & shoes to the cantilevers on my touring bike? Wouldn't the increased contact area provide better braking, and wouldn't that be useful, e.g. on a laden tourer in the wet?
On the subject of brakes (1), what are opinions on cantilevers versus V brakes? I test rode a Thorn Mercury yesterday and a popular option seems to be a cable operated rear disc brake with either a cantilever or V front rim brake. Just wondered what the pros and cons of each were?
On the subject of brakes (2), has anyone used Koolstop dual blocks, a combination of salmon and black; salmon for wet and black for dry conditions. I've moved back to Koolstop after finding the previous Swissstop disappointing.
On the subject of brakes (3) the Shimano R450 cantilever brake fitted to the Mercury seems to work so much better than the Tektro ones I have. I didn't realise there could be so much difference?
Re: Brake pad length
Interesting. I'm afraid that I don't know; that's why I raised the question.Clive wrote:It might making braking worse? if the same force is applied across a greater area = reduced force per given area = reduced friction ??
- Andy Terry
- Posts: 904
- Joined: 20 Nov 2006 14:27
- Real Name:
- Location: Bromsgrove, Worcs
- Philip Whiteman
- Posts: 2046
- Joined: 19 Nov 2006 16:17
- Real Name:
- Location: Drayton, Worcestershire
Entirely, the co-efficiency is also dependent upon within the brake block. Hence, a cheap block using lower quality rubber is going to be less effective than a more expensive and higher quality version.Andy Terry wrote:When you brake, the stopping force depends on the coefficient of friction between the brake block and the rim, and the clamping force applied.
Bigger brake blocks do not apply more force - they only apply the same force over a bigger area.
I could extend this conversation to my unfortunate knowledge and experience with the braking capabilities of railway carriages, but I won't.
- chris ankcorn
- Posts: 29
- Joined: 16 Jul 2008 22:25
- Real Name:
- Location: Selly Oak
The amount you pay for a brake pad is not necessarily an indication on its stopping ability.Philip Whiteman wrote: Entirely, the co-efficiency is also dependent upon within the brake block. Hence, a cheap block using lower quality rubber is going to be less effective than a more expensive and higher quality version.
If the brake compound is too hard it will wear your rim faster then a cheaper softer compound. I would prefer to use a cheap softer compound and be prepared to replace them before their down to the grooves.
Wiping your rims with white spirit on a regular basis makes an appreciable difference too.
I buy my brakes pads from Discobrakes. They are so cheap that you can afford to change them frequently.
I'm not saying I'm correct but this is my opinion and it has served me well.
- Philip Whiteman
- Posts: 2046
- Joined: 19 Nov 2006 16:17
- Real Name:
- Location: Drayton, Worcestershire
I disagree, Chris. It is not necessarily the softness of the rubber but the properties of the compound. Generally speaking, the more expensive versions such as Koolstop use a higher quality compound than say Shimano or BBB blocks. You can have a soft rubber with a poor coefficiency but have an equally soft rubber with a high coefficiency - as it all depends upon the manufacture crosslinking and polymer chains within the rubber that produce a high or low friction and thereby braking coefficiency. Cheaper types of block tend to use a greater proportion of raw rubber and within the subsequent manufacturing process, use less curing agent and accelerators for setting. As a result, the rubber is insufficiently 'tacky' to produce a good rate of friction. So in short, you get what you pay for.
- chris ankcorn
- Posts: 29
- Joined: 16 Jul 2008 22:25
- Real Name:
- Location: Selly Oak
Andy, clearly that's true, but is it the whole story? If that's the whole story, wouldn't that mean that pad size is irrelevant to stopping power? And, if that's the case, why do mountain bikes have bigger pads than road bikes? Just pad life?Andy Terry wrote:When you brake, the stopping force depends on the coefficient of friction between the brake block and the rim, and the clamping force applied.
Bigger brake blocks do not apply more force - they only apply the same force over a bigger area.
Might the area that the force is applied over influence the amount of deformation of the various components, and might that in turn affect the friction between pad and rim? And might the size of the pad influence the tendency for films of water and dust to get between the pad and the rim? Etc.
chris ankcorn wrote:The amount you pay for a brake pad is not necessarily an indication on its stopping ability.
There's no question in my mind that some brake blocks are much more effective than others, and that there is a crude correlation between what you pay and what you get. But not a precise correlation. In some cases (e.g. Campag), you pay an awful lot simply for the name. And brand A may be 10% better than brand B, but 100% more expensive.Philip Whiteman wrote:I disagree, Chris.
- Andy Terry
- Posts: 904
- Joined: 20 Nov 2006 14:27
- Real Name:
- Location: Bromsgrove, Worcs
Yes, I believe so.George wrote:Andy, clearly that's true, but is it the whole story?Andy Terry wrote:When you brake, the stopping force depends on the coefficient of friction between the brake block and the rim, and the clamping force applied.
Bigger brake blocks do not apply more force - they only apply the same force over a bigger area.
Assuming the same materials.
bigger pads = less pressure (same force over more area) = less wear
Softer blocks seem to get impregnated with tiny bits of metal and I've always felt that unless one frequently removes the blocks to extract these it is they that are wearing the rims more than the blocks themselves. Koolstop Salmon feel harder than an average block and they seem to last much longer and wear rims less so I reckon they work out much cheaper in the long run.
Eat cake before you're hungry